Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 28, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Opposed the increase from 48 to 66 events and said amplified music any night of the week imposes on nearby families; noted she has heard music despite it not being allowed.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 57:03 →A winery member and neighbor with three young kids asked that amplified music be indoor-only, saying outdoor speakers 200 feet away have disrupted his children's sleep.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 59:14 →Supported approval, citing the sound study and the inverse-square law showing noise compliance is achievable.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:01:21 →A 40-year resident and immediate neighbor said she has never heard music inside her home and praised the winery as a community gathering place.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:03:04 →Cited CDC hearing-damage thresholds at 85 decibels and submitted a 43-signature petition opposing amplified music, asking whether the council would 'prioritize profit over people.'
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:05:52 →Argued community gatherings should be free at Bartholomew Hall at the Methodist Church, not at a paid business venue with loud music.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:09:02 →